<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recent Webbys plagued with controversies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/recent-webbys-plagued-with-controversies/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/recent-webbys-plagued-with-controversies</link>
	<description>The Philippines&#039; Longest-running Technology Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:22:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maui</title>
		<link>http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/recent-webbys-plagued-with-controversies/comment-page-1#comment-214675</link>
		<dc:creator>Maui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 03:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/recent-webbys-plagued-with-controversies#comment-214675</guid>
		<description>on response to PWA&#039;s announcement on http://philippinewebawards.com/newsroom.asp?n=33

Does it mean that the scores published at Googlepages are the real scores but, since it was published without PWA consent, is unauthorized?

Still, PWA-Media G8way people are mum on the real issues here. Why? Are they afraid that no designers and developers will join next year&#039;s Philippine Web Awards? Are they afraid they cannot gain profit next year which could potentially make Media G8way bankrupt? Yet they have time to check http://punongbayanaraullo.googlepages.com/ of its authenticity rather than taking time to answer all issues and controversies raised by the participants.

The PWA-Media G8way people even have time to lurk and read all comments posted on blog sites containing PWA controversies rather than focusing on the real issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on response to PWA&#8217;s announcement on <a href="http://philippinewebawards.com/newsroom.asp?n=33" rel="nofollow">http://philippinewebawards.com/newsroom.asp?n=33</a></p>
<p>Does it mean that the scores published at Googlepages are the real scores but, since it was published without PWA consent, is unauthorized?</p>
<p>Still, PWA-Media G8way people are mum on the real issues here. Why? Are they afraid that no designers and developers will join next year&#8217;s Philippine Web Awards? Are they afraid they cannot gain profit next year which could potentially make Media G8way bankrupt? Yet they have time to check <a href="http://punongbayanaraullo.googlepages.com/" rel="nofollow">http://punongbayanaraullo.googlepages.com/</a> of its authenticity rather than taking time to answer all issues and controversies raised by the participants.</p>
<p>The PWA-Media G8way people even have time to lurk and read all comments posted on blog sites containing PWA controversies rather than focusing on the real issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bayanihan Blog Network &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What&#8217;s Up at the BBN</title>
		<link>http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/recent-webbys-plagued-with-controversies/comment-page-1#comment-214412</link>
		<dc:creator>Bayanihan Blog Network &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What&#8217;s Up at the BBN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/recent-webbys-plagued-with-controversies#comment-214412</guid>
		<description>[...] the Controversy-plagued Philippine Web Awards over at The Pinoy Tech [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Controversy-plagued Philippine Web Awards over at The Pinoy Tech [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Technographist</title>
		<link>http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/recent-webbys-plagued-with-controversies/comment-page-1#comment-214407</link>
		<dc:creator>The Technographist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/recent-webbys-plagued-with-controversies#comment-214407</guid>
		<description>So much more discussion on the plagiarism issue &lt;a href=&quot;http://technogra.ph/20071128/sections/news/is-a-winner-of-the-10th-philippine-web-awards-guilty-of-plagiarism/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much more discussion on the plagiarism issue <a href="http://technogra.ph/20071128/sections/news/is-a-winner-of-the-10th-philippine-web-awards-guilty-of-plagiarism/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FruityOaty</title>
		<link>http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/recent-webbys-plagued-with-controversies/comment-page-1#comment-211882</link>
		<dc:creator>FruityOaty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/recent-webbys-plagued-with-controversies#comment-211882</guid>
		<description>Actually, the first issue is that the actual PWA site (and fee payment processing) was so buggy that some people entering under &quot;Blogs&quot; category couldn&#039;t pay and complete the submission. Very... uh, Web 1.0.

When my friend tried to enter me (and tried to pay the $5.00 fee), she reported to me that she kept getting an error. I told her I&#039;d isolate the issue. As a software tester by trade, I reproduced the steps and informed PWA by e-mail.

If you recall, PWA kept delaying their final entry date... This is partially because they had so many bloody errors on their site. Hence, there were so many late entries and payments.

Anyway, what followed was a series of e-mails between me and PWA reps and developers... who kept saying the issue was fixed. But then I&#039;d re-test and tell them it wasn&#039;t. And so on... until I received a final &quot;ok, we fixed it&quot;.

THE PWA site itself SUCKS. For a web awards giving org, their site is riddled with errors and usability problemss

But I gotta say, $5 was worth it (well, my pal&#039;s money) since my Ratified.org shot up from #79 to #19! Lots of exposure, it seems resulted from being involuntarily nominated. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the first issue is that the actual PWA site (and fee payment processing) was so buggy that some people entering under &#8220;Blogs&#8221; category couldn&#8217;t pay and complete the submission. Very&#8230; uh, Web 1.0.</p>
<p>When my friend tried to enter me (and tried to pay the $5.00 fee), she reported to me that she kept getting an error. I told her I&#8217;d isolate the issue. As a software tester by trade, I reproduced the steps and informed PWA by e-mail.</p>
<p>If you recall, PWA kept delaying their final entry date&#8230; This is partially because they had so many bloody errors on their site. Hence, there were so many late entries and payments.</p>
<p>Anyway, what followed was a series of e-mails between me and PWA reps and developers&#8230; who kept saying the issue was fixed. But then I&#8217;d re-test and tell them it wasn&#8217;t. And so on&#8230; until I received a final &#8220;ok, we fixed it&#8221;.</p>
<p>THE PWA site itself SUCKS. For a web awards giving org, their site is riddled with errors and usability problemss</p>
<p>But I gotta say, $5 was worth it (well, my pal&#8217;s money) since my Ratified.org shot up from #79 to #19! Lots of exposure, it seems resulted from being involuntarily nominated. <img src='http://www.pinoytechblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vienna</title>
		<link>http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/recent-webbys-plagued-with-controversies/comment-page-1#comment-211449</link>
		<dc:creator>Vienna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/recent-webbys-plagued-with-controversies#comment-211449</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s weird! a real contest would not charge and normally, the contestants are nominated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s weird! a real contest would not charge and normally, the contestants are nominated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rickey</title>
		<link>http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/recent-webbys-plagued-with-controversies/comment-page-1#comment-211390</link>
		<dc:creator>Rickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/recent-webbys-plagued-with-controversies#comment-211390</guid>
		<description>OK, that&#039;s a bit ridiculous. So you win an award, then you remove your website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, that&#8217;s a bit ridiculous. So you win an award, then you remove your website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian DeVera</title>
		<link>http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/recent-webbys-plagued-with-controversies/comment-page-1#comment-211087</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian DeVera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/recent-webbys-plagued-with-controversies#comment-211087</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s like girls having to pay a &quot;processiing&quot; fee to enter a beauty pageant. A real contest would not charge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s like girls having to pay a &#8220;processiing&#8221; fee to enter a beauty pageant. A real contest would not charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
